There is a very important question that has been on my mind lately. It involves a person’s common sense…or lack of, really. Ok, maybe in a similar situation I wouldn’t be thinking straight either but he is a lawman and they are suppose to be able to think on their feet.
The question involves the movie “Cujo” which I happen to watch at least once a month. Whenever it gets to the part where the lawman goes out to the Camphor’s house to look for Dee Williams and the boy, I find myself shaking my head.
He pulls into the yard and sees the woman’s car. It is a mess with blood on both doors and a window all cracked up. He knows this is the car he was looking for. SO, why in the world would he park over by the barn and have to walk back to the car – thus opening himself up to a fatal attack by the rabid dog, Cujo? Any person with common sense would pull up to the car – why make yourself walk so far to get to it? Makes no sense.
Also, a lawman with common sense would also call it in before he got out to investigate. Our officer’s don’t leave their cars without calling in to tell the dispatcher’s where they are and what they will be doing. Why? Because if an officer suddenly needs help, he can scream “10-24” into his mike (which he carries with him out of the car) and the dispatcher would know exactly where he was and what situation he had been in prior to the call.
So, this lawman should have called the dispatcher, told them he was leaving his car to investigate the missing vehicle which he found at Camphor’s. He would have parked close to the car so that he could look inside with minimal effort. There is just no reason to do it the way he does in the movie and it always bothers me.
It also bothers me that Dee Williams gets his gun but then fails to shoot Cujo in the head when she has the chance. If I were in that situation, I would shoot the dog several times in the head at point blank range just to be sure it wouldn’t be coming back to haunt me. I would never assume it was dead just because it failed to get up after she stabbed it.
Another minor point about the movie is that they sweat to death in this little car for two days but it sits on an incline so she could have put it in neutral and let it roll back into the shade rather then sit there dehydrating.
Of course, there wouldn’t be much to movies if the character’s really had common sense now would there? But the show is kind of about how she learns the value of all she has and overcomes her fears to save her child’s life. It is suppose to make you feel sympathetic and apathetic to the main character. But I feel little of either when they don’t have the good sense to figure out the basics.
The movie “Prey” is another prime example. Why would you not fill everything available to you when it rained, rather then using your hands to drink water and letting the rest just fall to the ground? Especially in Africa, in the summer, when you are stranded in the desert? When it rained, after spending a day being thirsty, wouldn’t it be one of the first things you thought about – collecting the water so you’d have some the next day???
They don’t even use common sense on figuring out their situation until they’ve been out there two days because they kept thinking they’d get saved. I so liked Anthony Hopkin’s character in “The Edge” because he preached being prepared. If he didn’t need the stuff because he was rescued, great – but he was going to prepare like there was no rescue coming so that he could survive his ordeal. To me, that is what anyone with common sense would do.